Discussions Editorial Forum
Editorial Music & Art Imagine That Humour Travel Book Review
Women & Society News Round-Up Poetry Prev Issue Next Issue

Monday, July 9 2001
Planet-Hunting: The Search for Planets Outside the Solar System
- Vandana Singh

Vandana Singh is a former physicist, now a writer of science fact, science fiction and fantasy. She is also an editor of scientific and other works, and a member of Saheli, Austin. She is based in the greater Boston area.

 

A simple glance at the night sky stimulates the human imagination to soar beyond the terrestrial. As much as pre-flight humans once marveled at the freedom of birds, we in the twenty-first century dream about escaping the gravitational shackles of our planet. What will we find there, in the void of space, among distant suns? Will there be planets like those in our solar system? And if so, will there be life?

For most of humanity's sojourn on earth we have been unable to answer this question. Science fiction writers have spent decades joyfully speculating on the subject, but it is only now, at the close of the twentieth century, that we are beginning to read the answer in the night sky. There is already some evidence (see last time's column) that some planets and moons of the solar system may have conditions that support life. But what about worlds outside our cosmic backyard? Do any exist, and if so, what are the possibilities for life?

Looking for a Needle in the Cosmic Haystack

The task of finding extra-solar planets is a daunting one. Planets have no innate luminosity; they shine dimly in reflected light from the stars they orbit. Their presence must, for the most part, be deduced rather than detected directly.

Some of the ways that astronomers have developed to look for planets are nothing short of ingenious. Most stars are so distant from earth that they appear fixed in our night sky (their apparent movement across the sky is only due to the earth's motion). It takes hundreds or thousands of years for the stars' relative positions to change. If a star appears to move slightly against this relatively unchanging canvas, there is a chance that this motion might be caused by an unseen planet.


Planetary system around the sun like star HD168443
The sun like star HD168443 is located 123 light years away in the constellation Serpens. It is orbited by both a massive planet and another bulkier object of 17 - 40 Jupiter masses. Whether this bulky companion is a planet, a dim failed star called a brown dwarf, or some as-yet unidentified astronomical object is unclear. The star and inner planet are visible in the upper left, with the outer companion shown as a ringed world with a flare. Two rocky satellites orbit this large body.

Copyright © Lynette R. Cook, All Rights Reserved, Used with Permission.

This slight movement, or wobble, is the effect of the small gravitational pull of the planet. The to-and-fro movement of the star appears as a Doppler shift in the star's spectrum that alternates between the blue and red ends. (The Doppler effect is the change in frequency of a wave due to the motion of its source relative to us --- in the case of sound waves, it is familiar to any one of us who has heard the whistle of an approaching train drop in pitch as it moves away from us). The wobble can also be detected via astrometry --- careful measurements of the star's position over time. Until very recently astronomers were handicapped by the fact that the earth's atmosphere prevents such precise measurements of tiny motions --- it is like trying to see through a shifting veil. Two recent developments --- the Hubble Space telescope in orbit around the Earth, and the advent of adaptive optics, an ingenious way of compensating for the effects of the atmosphere on ground-based telescopes --- now enables us to see the night sky with startling clarity.

But because this wobble is so small, astronomers expect this method to work best for very massive Jupiter-like planets that are relatively close to the parent star. Similarly, occultation of the star by a planet, resulting in a change in brightness of the star as the planet passes briefly between it and us, can detect large planets. Earth-sized planets, however, are still beyond our detection capabilities, except for one very bizarre class of star called a pulsar. A pulsar is the remnant of a supernova explosion. It is a star only about 20 km across and is typically about one and a half times the mass of our sun. Matter is so compressed in such a star that a pin-head-sized peck of material would weigh as much as a battleship. The magnetic field of such a star is about a million million times that of earth. Pulsars also rotate rapidly. As a result, they can emit radio waves or X-rays or gamma-rays, which sweep out towards earth rather like a lighthouse beam, at extremely precise intervals. A disturbance in the timing of the radiation from the pulsar can indicate a planetary companion.

But the extreme conditions on a pulsar's planets make it unlikely that life as we know it can exist there. What prospects are there for detecting earth-sized planets of less violent stars? One method that has great promise for detecting earth-sized planets is called gravitational microlensing. According to Einstein's theory of General Relativity, gravitation bends light rather as a lens does. If we have two stars roughly in line with each other as seen from earth, the closer star can act as a gravitational lens, producing more than one image of the distant star. If the closer star has a planetary companion, the resulting variation in the brightness of the image can reveal the planet's existence.

One of the most dramatic methods of looking for extra-solar planets is to look at star nurseries. Stars typically form when a cosmic dust cloud begins to condense due to gravitational forces. If conditions are right, the star will ignite at the center, while planetary material will begin to condense into planets further from the star. Once the star has shed its embryonic veil of gas and dust, the still-glowing proto-planets may be clearly visible.

A Brief Chronology of Planet-hunting

The dream of other worlds is a compelling one indeed. Way back in 1916, astronomer E.E. Barnard discovered a star about 6 light-years away that had a very large proper motion (the motion against the backdrop of fixed stars). This led to speculation as to whether Barnard's star had planetary companions. Astronomer Peter van de Kamp spent most of his life studying this star, looking at over 2000 photographic plates to see if there was a wobble in the star's motion. After 40 years of devoted study he concluded that Barnard's star did indeed harbor a Jupiter-like planet. However subsequent studies, including observations through the Hubble Space telescope, failed to confirm van de Kamp's findings. If Barnard's star does indeed have planets, they are likely to be small ones.

The first confirmed discovery of extra-solar planets occurred in 1992. Astronomers Wolszczan and Frail, studying timing signals from a pulsar named PSR 1257+12 in the constellation Virgo, deduced the existence of two planets. Subsequent observations raised the number of planets to four, at least two of which are about 3 times the mass of the earth, and one is far smaller. These planets are bombarded by intense radiation and as such are thought to be unlikely candidates for life-bearing worlds.


The pulsar PSR 1257+12 has three confirmed planets
Discovered by Alex Wolszczan before planets were ever discovered around sunlike stars. The pulsar¹s radiation regularly sweeps over the planet, energizing its atmosphere, causing auroras, and bathing it in an eerie green light.
Copyright © Lynette R. Cook, All Rights Reserved, Used with Permission.

Then, in 1995, the year Peter van de Kamp died, Mayor and Queloz of Geneva Observatory detected a wobble around the star 51 Pegasi. It is now believed that a Jupiter-like planet circles this star at a distance about one-eighth that of Mercury from our sun. The surface temperature of the planet is estimated to be a blistering 1300 degrees celsius!

After 1995 there was a flurry of new discoveries, some of which had to be retracted after mistakes in the data and their interpretation were found. To date, there are some sixty confirmed planets orbiting suns other than our own. Most of them have been found via the wobble method --- these are massive giants about 1 to 13 Jupiters in mass. A multi-university team led by astronomers Geoffrey Marcy and R. Paul Butler have discovered the largest numbers of planets.

The planetary status of some of these giants is still in question. It is possible that some of these alleged planets --- particularly the heavier ones --- are actually brown dwarfs, which are essentially failed stars. Brown dwarfs are typically about 10 - 80 times the mass of Jupiter but shine only briefly by burning deuterium.

The next significant discovery in the planetary pageant was that of a multi-planet system, the first one found orbiting a normal star (as opposed to a pulsar). In 1999, Marcy and Butler's team found three planets circulating a sun-like star called Upsilon Andromedae about 44 light-years away from us. The planet masses are 0.71, 2.11 and 4.61 times that of Jupiter, and the farthest is about 2.5 AU (I AU is the distance between the Earth and our sun). This is a significant discovery as it allows us to compare, for the first time, our own solar system with another one.


The Upsilon Andromedae System
Copyright © Lynette R. Cook, All Rights Reserved, Used with Permission.

One of the most bizarre recent discoveries is that of "free-floaters". In 2000, astronomers led by Philip Lucas and Patrick Roche found twenty drifting bodies in the Orion nebula. By looking at the spectra of these objects they found hints of the presence of water vapor, which indicates that these bodies are rather light. Whether they are planets is a subject of controversy as also a matter of definition. Detractors believe that they are simply lightweight objects formed by the fragmentation of gas clouds.

NEWS FLASH!! Possible Sighting of Free-Floating Planets!

As we go to press, a team led by Kailash Sahu has observed, through the Hubble Space telescope, six freely floating objects in the star cluster M22. These were observed through gravitational microlensing --- a phenomenon that causes a momentary brightening of a distant star as the foreground object passes in front of it. These objects are estimated to be only about 80 times the mass of our Earth, and if confirmed, may be the smallest objects found outside the solar system!

For the full story as well as pictures and animation showing how gravitational microlensing works, click here


But the latest evidence we have of an extra-solar planet actually consists of an image captured on a photographic plate --- a picture of a newly formed star and its possible planetary companion. The still-aglow companion may in fact be a distant celestial object, but Ray Jayawardhana, the young Sri Lankan astronomer who discovered it in 1999, estimates that we shall know for sure by the end of this year. If the object appears to tag the star, it is very likely a planet about twice the mass of Jupiter, orbiting the star at a distance about thrice that between Pluto and our sun. The star is part of a small nursery of a few dozen stars called TW Hydrae. There are 9 other star nurseries near us that are being studied.

Mysteries Galore

Each discovery of an extra-solar planet has expanded our knowledge of our universe, and at the same time, has left us with deeper mysteries. For instance, standard theories of planetary formation hold that gas giants like Jupiter typically form far from the star, as is the case in our solar system. However many extra-solar planets appear to be uncomfortably close to their sun, less than 1 A.U.! How can this be possible? Could they have been knocked closer to the sun because of gravitational interaction with another planet? Theorists are busy reconstructing their ideas.

Our solar system has nearly circular orbits. Before the discovery of extra-solar planets, we had no way of knowing if this was the norm or whether we were some kind of fortunate exception. So far, many of the planets found have highly eccentric orbits (that is, orbits far from being circular --- oval or elliptic). This also makes it less likely that there is life (as we know it) on these worlds. A circular orbit means that the planet has more or less stable temperature, a condition conducive to life. In multi-planet systems, highly eccentric orbits might mean that some planets get too close to each other, which can cause disturbances ranging from massive tidal forces and disruption of the planet's orbit to destruction of the planet itself.

Then there is the question of planets around pulsars. How could planets end up circling the remnant of a supernova explosion? Are they later captives of the pulsar, or were they old companions orbiting the original star at some safe distance, only to be reined in closer after the explosion?

It is clear that our old view of the universe, obtained through the shifting veil of our planet's atmosphere, must now give way to new insights. Our universe is far more complicated, beautiful and surprising than we had imagined. As for the old question "Are we alone?" we have taken only a very small step in the direction of the answer. Perhaps this is a good thing. Perhaps our enforced isolation from other worlds will give us time --- time to appreciate the uniqueness of our own blue-green jewel of a planet, swimming bravely through the void of space, brimming with life. And time also to develop the wisdom we shall surely need if we do indeed encounter intelligent life on other worlds.

Addendum

>NASA Science News for November 27, 2001

Astronomers using the Hubble Space Telescope have detected the atmosphere of a planet circling a Sun-like star 150 light years away. Their ground-breaking discovery shows it is possible to measure the chemical makeup of distant planets -- and to search for chemical markers of life far beyond Earth.

FULL STORY at: http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast27nov_1.htm?list552238

References

This article is based to a large extent on the following excellent reports and websites and the references therein. (I claim full responsibility, however, for any errors or omissions).

  1. The graphics on this page are paintings and not real pictures of extrasolar planets. For a breathtaking array of such paintings by master artist Lynette Cook, who has produced imaginative perspectives of the planets discovered by several groups, including the Marcy and Butler team, visit: http://extrasolar.spaceart.org/
  2. Science News, October 21, 1995, May 19, 2001, May 26, 2001
  3. http://www.sciencenews.org
  4. http://exoplanets.org, the site of the Marcy and Butler team
  5. http://www.public.asu/~sciref/exoplnt.htm, a very thorough catalog and historical report from Arizona State University.
  6. http://www.obspm.fr/planets, the site of the Observatoire de Paris, containing the most up-to-date information and a catalog of extra-solar planets.
  7. http://www.rog.nmm.ac.uk/leaflets/pulsars/pulsars.html, pulsar pages of the site of the Royal Observatory in Greenwich.

View and Post comment on this article

The contents of the article are Copyright © of the author and may not be reproduced in any form without prior written permission from the author.